Saturday, August 6, 2011

WHAT ABOUT THEIR RIGHTS?

While I have been writing lately about the "important" events happening in the world such as the U.S. debt crisis, there have been other stories piling up that also need to be told.

Initially, I starting writing this blog as a way to speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, in particular innocent dead victims and their families who are also victims, left with endless, indescribable loss, pain, suffering. More so crystallized for me by the negligence of many entities and others who caused the death of my 30 year old son, Steven Nathaniel Wolkoff. 

Some readers and non readers of this Blog criticize my focus on this, as morbid, others lend support, and mostly everyone has not the slightest clue of the finality, forever inconsolable grief, never to heal, that we feel, as victims families. 

The vast majority of people don't even want to think of these horrors, let alone read about them. So I will remind you that these are human beings and they deserve your attention to their death, they lived, they died in horrible ways, show them your respect.

It is impossible with the current magnitude of such a large rate of innocents being slaughtered and justice being ignored for any one to report on many of these stories in a timely manner. But it does haunt me and should bother you in the same way.

I have selected two stories for today's post to be representative of the many other victims during the past 2 weeks that I can't write about, because there are just too many for me to cover them all. 

             AME DEAL-REST IN PEACE
                                          




The family of a 10-year-old found dead in a trunk outside an Arizona home initially claimed the child died while playing hide-and-seek. But investigators now believe Ame Deal suffocated after her family locked her in the box because she took a Popsicle from the freezer without permission.

Phoenix police claim Deal's grandmother, aunt and two cousins regularly subjected the child to horrific treatment, ultimately culminating in her July 12 death.

"This child died at the hands of those who were supposed to love and care for her. ... This case has turned the stomachs of some of our most seasoned detectives," said Phoenix Police spokesman Sergeant Trent Crump in a statement posted on the city's website.

Deal's passing was classified as a "death unknown" until July 28, according to the police press release. But after Deal's cousin Samantha Allen, 23, and her husband, John Allen, 23, admitted putting the child in the trunk and padlocking it, authorities charged the couple with first degree murder.

John Allen was allegedly angry with Deal because she had taken a popsicle from the freezer, AZFamily reports.

The victim's aunt, Cynthia Stoltzmann, 44, and grandmother, Judith Deal, 62, were charged with child abuse and kidnapping after reportedly admitting to locking the child in the box on previous occasions.

Witnesses told investigators the child was regularly punished by being locked in the trunk. They also saw the caregivers force Deal to eat dog feces as punishment, crush cans barefoot and exercise outdoors in "extreme measures," according to ABC15.

Deal's aunt allegedly confessed to putting hot sauce in the child's mouth, striking her with a paddle dubbed "Butt Buster" and ordering the child to sleep on the floor of a stall shower because she had a problem with wetting the bed, the news station reports.

Deal, who weighed just 59 pounds and was discovered in soiled clothing, died in a box that measured less than 3 feet long, 14 inches wide and one foot tall, according to The New York Daily News.

Twelve children who lived at the residence have been taken into custody by Child Protective Services, ABC15 reports.The whereabouts of the child's mother are unknown and authorities are currently trying to locate Deal's biological father

This is as I have said a horrific story about the murder of Ame Deal by her family, a child who deserved much better in her short life than she got. Nobody cared about her, the neighbors never bothered even calling the Police all the time that they knew this poor child was being tortured.

How many of you reading the blog even knew about this horrible murder, and why not, because it is now "normal" to have victims, especially little children murdered on a daily basis, and no one even pays attention to this any longer. 

The media doesn't really care, they hype these acts of murder endlessly, as a way to be able to charge more for ads, and ignore many others deemed by them "unworthy" deaths of victims, who never even make it to the news. 

Yes, the world has become such a sicko, wacko place, that the unimaginable has become common, and no one pays attention to why and how this could be. We have reached the lowest point of a society, where the killing of little children, other victims of all ages, is condoned by denial, silence, and apathy. These headlines seem almost like bad jokes, except they are very real and defy the imagination in that these are true, horrific, barbaric, horrors.

Which leads me directly to the next OUTRAGE of this week in the good ole dysfunctional justice system that dispenses little justice, and limps along under its own corrupt, self serving circus of the absurd concerned mainly about the rights, fairness to the defendant, but ignores the rights of victims. 

The law in this case says we're not going to give the government multiple times to prosecute you. We are going to value finality more than we value the truth.

It’s obvious something needs to be changed. There are far too many guilty people wandering around not paying for their crimes, and there are far too many innocents lying in graves, rotting away.



Double Jeopardy: Getting Away With Murder


In 2004, Isaac Turnbaugh of Vermont was acquitted of killing his coworker. Police say he recently contacted them, however, and confessed to the murder. But there's not much they can do.

Some might call it an outrage, but he's protected under a basic Fifth Amendment concept better known as "double jeopardy," and prosecutors say their hands are tied.

"He could have turned over a video tape of him committing the murder and it wouldn't change the fact that double jeopardy is attached," Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell told The Huffington Post. "We had our chance. The jury acquitted him and, just in the same way OJ could confess today to his wife's murder, it wouldn’t affect what could be done to him."

Turnbaugh, now 28, stood trial in 2004 on a charge of first-degree murder in the shooting death of Declan Lyons, 24. The two men were coworkers at the restaurant American Flatbread in Waitsfield, a town located about 20 miles southwest of Montpelier, Vt.

Lyons, engaged and expecting his first child, was found dead outside the restaurant on April 12, 2002. He had been mixing sauce in an outdoor cauldron when witnesses inside the restaurant heard a loud popping noise. WPTZ reported that, when the waitresses went outside to investigate, they found an unresponsive Lyons on the ground with a gaping head wound.

Police had no suspects in the case until the following month, when Turnbaugh went to a party and allegedly told six friends that he had shot Lyons. One of the friends told Turnbaugh's mother and she reportedly contacted the police.

"The whole reason he was charged was because he was sitting around the campfire with friends taking mushrooms and, amidst some sort of schizophrenic break, he confessed to this shooting, to being responsible for [the terrorist attacks of] 9/11 and an assortment of other things," Turnbaugh's former attorney, Kurt Hughes, told The Huffington Post.
During police questioning, Turnbaugh denied killing Declan Lyons and said he considered him a "really good buddy."Friends also described Turnbaugh and Lyons as good friends, which made it difficult to establish a motive.

"All of us can't fathom why this would have happened," former co-worker Jen Moffroid told WPTZ in August 2002.
"Not a lot of bad vibes. Not a lot of animosity . . . You don't know what to believe and we're just trusting in the system and hoping that the police and courts can figure out what really happened here. We all would really like to know what really happened."

Hughes said the case was extraordinary, in that he had easy access to Lyons' coworkers and friends -- a rare convenience for a suspect's defense."They all loved Isaac as much as they loved the victim. It was unlike anything I had been involved in before," he said.

Following his arrest, Turnbaugh was diagnosed with a serious mental illness. The case did not go to court for roughly two years. When it did, Turnbaugh's lawyer argued that his client was ill and said that the FBI was unable to establish that a rifle belonging to his client was the murder weapon.

According to WCAX, prosecutors never denied that they did not have a motive for the crime, but were hoping that lies Turnbaugh had told police -- as well as his confession at the party -- would help them to prove premeditated murder.

On April 6, 2004, after five hours of deliberation, jurors found Turnbaugh not guilty of murder.

Sorrell said that he was surprised by the verdict. "We had these admissions from him, but he had a very good lawyer who was able to raise reasonable doubt that if you couldn't believe that he was involved with 9/11, then you couldn't believe that he was involved in this murder," the Vermont attorney general said. "The jury did its job. We gave it our best shot. Our justice system isn't always perfect, but it is darn good."

In the month after he was found innocent, Turnbaugh found himself in hot water with police following a 7-hour standoff in which he was involved. Other than that, he has kept a relatively low profile. That is, until he contacted police in Montpelier recently and allegedly confessed to killing Declan Lyons. There is, however, nothing police can do about it.

According to Anne Bremner, a Seattle attorney and legal analyst, the double jeopardy clause forbids authorities from trying Turnbaugh again for murder in this case.
"The framers of the Constitution wanted to preclude government harassment of citizens via successive and potentially harassing prosecutions," Bremner explained to The Huffington Post.

"Let's take Casey Anthony's case," Bremner continued. "Even if she confesses to Barbara Walters, Oprah, or Larry Flynt, for that matter, double jeopardy would preclude charging or prosecuting her again."

Once again, attorneys on both sides are in disagreement about the alleged confession. "He's mentally ill. He made similar so-called confessions before the trial, so it's nothing new. It's part of his illness [and] it sounds like he's having a relapse of some sort," Hughes said.

Sorrell, on the other hand, believes Turnbaugh's alleged confession."He gave some details this time that were consistent with evidence in the case," Sorrell said. "Clearly, the victim had a head wound, but the police were never able to find any bullet or bullet fragments enough to do any ballistics, so we did not have evidence of any particular caliber or any particular gun. We believed it was a high-powered rifle, and we knew that Isaac Turnbaugh owned a 30-30 rifle. So, this time, he did say he shot him in the head with the 30-30.”

There have been speculation and rumors that authorities could go after Turnbaugh on other potential charges such as perjury, but Sorrell said the defendant did not testify on his own behalf, so perjury is out of the question. Besides that, the statute of limitations is up and "that's not what we're looking to do here," he said.

A civil suit is also unlikely, the attorney general said."Quite frankly, I'm not sure that the victim's family would be looking for monetary reward," Sorrell said. "[Secondly], even if they got a verdict for a hundred million dollars, I'm not sure they would be in a position to collect a dime from Isaac Turnbaugh."

Police have not talked to Turnbaugh since his alleged confession. He did not respond to an interview request from The Huffington Post.

According to Sorrell, authorities still believe Turnbaugh is the killer, and do not plan to re-open the case."It's just a terrible tragedy," he said. "But, he has to live with what, in fact, he has done."

AND SO DOES THE VICTIM "LIVE" WITH BEING DEAD IN HIS GRAVE, AND HIS FAMILY WHO MOURN HIS LOSS FOREVER.

WHAT ABOUT THEIR RIGHTS? 

WHAT ABOUT THE HUMAN, LEGAL RIGHTS OF ALL VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES?

WHO WILL SPEAK UP FOR THEM?